Ginsberg & Ginsberg, LLC v. Alexandria Estates, LLC — 3/24/2014

The defendant…appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff…after remand by this court for a determination of priorities. See Ginsberg & Ginsberg, LLC v. Alexandria Estates, LLC, 136 Conn. App. 511, 48 A.3d 101 (2012). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) relied solely on two warranty deeds to support its determination that the plaintiff’s mortgage had priority over the defendant’s claimed interest in the subject property, (2) ‘failed to allow’ the plaintiff’s counsel to testify with respect to the title search he had prepared in connection with the foreclosure action, and (3) ‘followed an inappropriate directive from the Appellate Court’ in the remand order. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

AC35759

Read Opinion

Posted in: Appellate, Connecticut, Foreclosure Decisions, State

Leave a Comment (0) ↓